Two major forces drive the increased need for third party monitoring and evaluation: the need to learn from program implementation to improve effectiveness and impact on the affected communities and accountability for donor funding. Third party monitoring and evaluation services provide a truly independent and unbiased assessment of projects and evaluate the impact on the affected communities in order to improve the quality of program design and implementation.
Our monitoring and evaluation services aim to enhance transparency, accountability, resource use, and improve delivery of services. The firm draws on innovative theories and practices to assess the performance of organizations and programmes in the following areas: i) humanitarian aid and peacebuilding; ii) governance, security, justice, and human rights; iii) gender equality; iv) education; v) livelihoods, and employability; and vi) disaster risk reduction.
We help our clients:
Service Spotlight
Third-Party Monitoring (TPM) Projects
Jouri has conducted TPM on GOAL’s Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) programme serving conflict-affected populations in Syria. The purpose of the monitoring was to assess the Relevance and Appropriateness of water services, the Accessibility and the Delivery, as well as the Responsiveness and the Coordination of the program. In order to monitor the activities, Jouri used a mix-approach to data collection with both quantitative and qualitative methods. The report highlighted the key achievements made by GOAL and provided practical recommendations. An online presentation was held to present the findings.
Jouri was mandated to undertake a TPM of World Vision’s activities in health and protection to respond to basic needs of vulnerable populations in Syria. Jouri conducted two rounds of outcome monitoring to ensure measurement of Strategic Objective Indicators related to the improved access to quality health and protection services of the targeted communities. The TPM assessed, among other criteria, the beneficiary satisfaction, the effectiveness of the project’s response to COVID-19 risks and conducted on-site checklists to assess the availability of essential drugs and equipment in the health facilities. The final report presented the consolidated findings of the two rounds and recommendations for future programs.